Реферат: Montesquieus Definition Of Law Essay Research Paper
Montesquieu`s Definition Of Law Essay, Research Paper
The following was completed for a Political Thought and Theory Class in my
Senior Year of Highschool..my grade was an 85 Montesquieu: Definition of Law
Into the first three chapters of Book 1, The Spirit of Laws, Montesquieu
condensed a lifetime of thinking, not so much on law as what law is, (after all,
the work by Montesquieu is entitled The Spirit of Laws, not The Laws of the
Spirit). The definition of law provided to us by Montesquieu can be most clearly
identified as a series of relationships which are derived from the nature of
things; relationships varying not only among human beings, but animals and
thought. Background: Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondatbaron de la Br?de et
de Born January 18, 1689, Montesquieu (Caption 1-1) belonged to an old family of
modest wealth that had been ennobled in the 16th century for services to the
crown. Charles-Louis studied at the faculty of law at the University of
Bordeaux, was graduated, and ventured out for experience in law. He married
Jeanne de Lartique and through marriage he became socially and financially
secure. He wrote many works pertaining to the lawfield (Encarta).
Montesquieu?s Definitions of Law ?Laws, in their most general signification,
are the necessary relations arising from the nature of things.? (Spirit)
Montesquieu in the first book would seem to be collating all that has been said
on the law into some complex equation, eliminating the common and arriving at
some simple solution. Thus, laws in the most general sense are the relationships
between things (all things) as the nature of things shows: the nature of things
seen, heard, and read. God isn?t seen nor heard, or read; still, he must have
his place, but not first in the order of the nature of things (Catholic).
?There is, then, a prime reason; and laws are the relations subsisting between
it and different beings, and the relations of these to one another.? (Spirit)
But we have overlooked a key word kept by Montesquieu in his most concentrated
definition: laws are not only relationships, they are necessary relationships.
Here grows a somewhat ambiguous question. Why are they necessary? They are not
--> ЧИТАТЬ ПОЛНОСТЬЮ <--