Реферат: Online Interviews With Gwendolyn Brooks Essay Research
of our very famous European poets has said. This is very difficult because all of us
American poets have been thoroughly brainwashed into believing that what has already been
published is it!
SC: In the short manual on black poetry writing that you wrote, [Gwendolyn Brooks,
Keorapetse Kgositsile, Haki R. Madhubuti (Don L.Lee), Dudley Randall, Black Poetry
Writing, Detroit: Broadside Press, 1975] you comment on poetry being a transient
thing and it serving an immediate purpose more than a person intentionally trying to write
for posterity or for something that will be permanent.
Brooks: That does not express what I have been doing; whatever I said to that effect
was about those black poets in the late sixties, some of whom, not all but some of whom
felt that black poetry shouldn’t be written with an eye to posterity billions and
trillions of years from now. They felt, some of them, that if they wrote a poem that
worked for black people today, it would have served its purpose, and if it died after the
poem had done what the poet wanted it to feel–again not all–feel that they do want to be
read thousands of years from now. I’m afraid that I’m weak enough to think that it would
be very nice if somebody could get some nourishment or healing or just plain rich pleasure
out of poems I’m writing today.
SC: Another thing from Black Poetry Writing that I’d like to get a comment on.
You broke black poetry down into three stages, a first stage that was a statement of
condition, and then moving to a poetry of integration, and then the present poetry being
more an assertive, positive, individualistic thing.
Brooks: I was describing my own three stages of creativity. One, I call my
"express myself" stage, because I was writing about anything and everything in
my environment just because I wanted to express myself–flailing about. And second, my
"integration flavoring" stage when I wrote a lot of poems which I hoped would
bring black people and white people and all people together, and they didn’t seem to be
doing that (laughter) in great numbers at any rate, and a third stage governed by that
little credo that some of the Black poets had in the late sixties, "Black poetry is
poetry written by blacks, about blacks, and to black," and then, I’m trying very